![]() In colloquial English, these 'incorrect participle clauses' are usually okay, and you can even find an example in Shakespeare's Hamlet: So these participle clauses are considered wrong in standard English. In this example you get the feeling that the baby has driven the car. → Falscher Partizipialsatz: Driving on the motorway, the baby started to cry. Otherwise the sentences might sound rather strange.Įxample: I was driving on the motorway, when the baby started to cry. → (With) Mrs Jones going to New York, Mr Smith took up her position.Īpart from the exceptions mentioned above, participle clause and main clause should have the same subject. This is very formal, however, and not often used.Įxample: Mrs Jones went to New York. For further information see Infinitive or Ing-Form)Ī participle construction is also possible, if both subjects are mentioned (often the word 'with' is put before the subject in the participle clause). (Note: Some of the verbs mentioned here can also be used with the infinitive. Here, the participle clause must directly follow the object it is relating to. ![]() This is the case for example if the main clause contains one of the following verbs + object: Sometimes participle clauses can be used even if the clauses to be combined do not have the same subject. Participle Clauses with different Subjects
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |